|
|
|
1-21-03
PRESENTATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE JOINT HOUSE AND SENATE HEARING THE PROGRAM Although it is still "a work in progress", it is the most successful tire- recycling program in the country. It is a concept that has the ability to satisfy every aspect of dealing with a scrap tire. It is the program that solves 100% of the problem. When compared to other states that collect fees from the tire consumer for tire recycling, Louisiana’s tire consumer enjoy the lowest cost of a total solution than any of those states or Canada. In other words YOU have put the money in the "right place". It is a concept that has the ability to satisfy every aspect of dealing with the scrap tire problem. The small tip fee collected in the Louisiana program, only on the retail sale of a new tire, pays to collect, process and market every scrap tire generated in Louisiana weighing up to 500 lbs. If you consider what these small tip fees have accomplished, it’s almost unbelievable for our industry. This small tip fee pays It deals withfor these categories that do not pay into the waste tire fund: Used tires; Tires on new automobiles that will eventually come into the system; Tires from automobile salvage yards; Trucking companies; ATV tires; It has cleaned up all stockpiles in Louisiana; Cleaned up small Oone time clean ups (any one with a few hundred tireshundred tires); and Tires from Parish collection centers. Many lessons have been learned and more will be learned, as the tire recycling business is very complicated. Because this program represents something that has never been done in this country, a program that solves 100% of scrap tire problem, some industry people are skeptical that this program will continue to work. Sadly, most states continue to gauge the success of their programs by how much money they spend to clean up illegal tire dumps. Unfortunately, recent problems in this model scrap tire program have risen to crisis proportions. The fund is exhausted and will pay the processors a lesser amount than the $150 per ton we have received since February 2001. The problem is we have invested more than 2 million dollars over the last 2 years in a move towards the higher end markets you ask us to achieve when you gave us the raise. Those investments were made on the basis of being paid $150 per ton. Without immediate attention, the program that was so diligently constructed will simply fail. My presentation is two fold: One, to identify the problem and Two, propose a workable solution.
THE PROBLEM Number 1:
We think the problems started when tThe agency was restructured and funding was reduced. The AGENCY TIRE GROUP that had been watching the program disappeared. After five years of success it appears to us the program was put on automatic pilot. It’s not like we didn’t know the program needed to be watched, a processor pleads guilty to a felony and pays a $600,000 fine, a transporter is sent to a federal penitentiary, just to name a couple. In the face of this the agency stopped auditing our monthly reports. In order to gain some insight into the consequences of this agency action we reviewed some limited public records and found the following: NUMBER 2:
A processor who shows inventories of 230,000 whole tires and over 15,000,000 lbs. (750,000 Tires) of processed material when in fact he has no visible inventory of processed material and only a few whole tires on site? It doesn’t appear that this processor has used these inventories to their benefit, but because it continues to appear on the monthly reports, those weights are there and could be used at any time in the future. This inventory represents 1.5 million dollars. It appears that inventory numbers on all reports are not actual inventories, but are inventories that have been arbitrarily selected each month. There are other examples. numbers. THE PROBLEM CONTINUES:
WEIGHTING TIRES WITH NO TIRE COUNT
The only integrity a fee-based program has is the relationship between the tire count and the weight of tires processed. Processed weight divided by the number of PTE’S processed gives an average weight per PTE. A PTE is a passenger tire equivalent. tire equivalent. For 18 months one processor had an average weight per PTE was as high as 34 lbs., when his weight per PTE for the months before and the months since have been around 20 lbs. If the recent numbers (20 lbs. per PTE) on the reports are correct, the fund could have paid as much as $600,000 over what it should have paid? Processors report monthly activity in different ways. This in its self removes the checks and balances that keep the program participants honest. Without these checks and balances, the agency has nothing to compare with their audit numbers. If all processors reported the same way, the agency could find a number on average weight per PTE, the number should be in the same range for all of the processors. Average weights per PTE are the only integrity the program has. For example, if I wanted to cheat the program, (since know the agency does not audit my report or check my average weight per PTE): I could bring in un-manifested tires to my facility from other states, shred those tires with my program tires, and because no one checks the average weight per PTE, I could collect for the entire lot. I could weigh the same load of tire material several times while taking it to market. If I have a friend in the trucking business, say someone who hauls sugar cane,. tThey could weigh their loads and bring me their weight tickets; I could then include those weight tickets with my report each month for payment from the tire fund. I could create a fictitious number for an inventory that does not exist. I could use this non-existent inventory to create my own average weight per PTE after adding un-manifested tires or processed tire material to my monthly request for payment. I could process my tires into a 2" minus chip for sale to fuel markets that require a product with no wire. After I remove the wire, which could be as much as 40% of the tire, I could add rubber from other sources to make up that 40% and be paid for 100% (are more) of tires collected for that month. The problem would be that I added material from other sources that are not eligible for the $150 per ton payment from the tire fund.
THE PROBLEM CONTINUES: THE TRANSPORTERS
The public records reveal that the problems do not stop with the Processors. From June 2001 to April 2002, eleven months, one used tire store delivered almost 225,000 PTE’"S to a processor. We have been unable to verify that there was ever a used tire store at the address registered with DEQ. In a town with a population of 929 we could not find any one who knew of an operation large enough to change an average of 3622 truck tires plus 1783 passenger tires in a month. These numbers would make this used tire store, in Campi, La., the largest retail tire store in Louisiana. These are only a few examples we found while looking at the public records that appear to be problems.
A video showing tires from Texas being loaded in a processor trailer. WHAT DO WE DO TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
I think we’ve learned this is not a program that will operate on automatic pilot. I believe it will work only when when a dedicated group is reestablished within the agency to over see the program. TFrom the outside it appears to us the group should be a minimum of at least six people. One department head, two enforcement persons, two persons to audit the monthly reports, one person for registration, permits, and certifications. This program requires the full time management of the agency. The program has a history of those who would in the program engage in illegal activities in order to exploit the fund. The main reason a dedicated group is needed is because, as you might have noticed, our business looks simple, but in fact is very complicated. It works best when the same people work with the program every day so that they will know the players and the players know that people who understand the program are watching them. This group should not be effected by budget cuts as it is funded by money available from the dedicated waste tire fund as outlined in LAC.33: VII Section 10535.C2, which states; a maximum of 10 percent of the waste tire fees collected may be utilized for program administration. A person from this dedicated group should be required to travel to the processor’ s facility (there are currently four) each month and observe the processor as they compile their monthly request for payment. This would also give them an opportunity to verify inventories. The agency should be required to audit reports from processors each month. Stop the flow of non-program tires and processed tire material from being brought into the program by those seeking to exploit the system. OTR’S (off the road tires) weighing more than 500 lbs. are not program tires. They should not receive payment from the fund. Require the agency to audit all participants in the program, Used tire dealers, transporters, markets, used tire wholesalers, etc. After the audit, the agency should be given the ability to collect money from those participants who have been found to have deficiencies in payments to the agency or for any tires that they put into the program that are found to be ineligible for payment in the program. Give the agency the laws and the ability to prosecute any serious infractions found in those audits. All tires should be counted. The only integrity the program has is the relationship between tire count and processed tire weight. Tires must be counted in order to maintain that integrity. Request for payment form should have a place to tract all program and non-program whole tires and processed tire material program or non-program processed tire material. Require an officer of the company requesting payment for activities during a given month to sign the monthly request for payment. When All processors should be required to report report the same way on the same forms supplied by the agency. When they report the same,, a simple formula can be applied to monthly request for payment. It will give the agency the proper checks and balances to watch the processors and an excellent place to watch for any problem that might harm the program. The agency should hold a class that would explain the meaning of each line and what number should be placed on that line. An officer of the processor company should be present in that class with whomever else they feel should attend. Simple formula for figuring average weight per PTE. PTE (passenger tire equivalent) 1. Passenger tire =1 PTE 2. Truck tire = 5 PTEs 3. OTR (off the road) tire = 5 PTEs TOTAL WEIGHT PROCESSED ÷ TOTAL PTE’S PROCESSED= AVERAGE WEIGHT PER PTE.
All processed tire material, whether that material is marketed or inventoried, should be weighted on certified public scales. Each load should have an empty weight ticket. Weight tickets for processed tire material, whether marketed or inventoried should accompany the monthly report to DEQ. When weights are found to be over an average of 22 lbs. per PTE, as it relates to the tire count and the weight of the tires processed, a review of that monthly report should take place with an officer of the processor company in question. Create a Computer program that would list estimated monthly tires generated by each generator so that tire counts from manifest submitted in monthly report to the agency could be used to spot large difference between the two. Enforcement could give those generators an opportunity to explain the difference. ReRequire inventory numbers to be the actual number of tires and processed material stored on the processor’s facility on the first day of each month. Revoke all exemptions issued by the department that now exist in the program. Allow a grace period to reapply. Transporters should be bonded. The agency should be required to have a hearing or arbitration process for a processor found to be out of compliance with DEQ rules, before any funds can be delayed or withheld from monthly payment for marketed tire material. Some type of system that would assess fines could be put in the place of withholding funds.
The agency should be required to establish an inventory of all processed tire material in the state produced prior to January 1,1998 with a value of $15 per ton. Also an inventory should be established of tire material produced after January 1, 1998 and before January 1, 2001 with a value of $100 per ton. A system should be devised to maintain control of the inventory until that material has been delivered to a market. Those inventories of processed tire material should be kept separate from processed tire material produced after January 31, 2001 with a value of $150 per ton. All program or non-program scrap tires and processed tire material should be stored separately in order to maintain accurate inventories. Change definition on MEDIUM TRUCK TIRES: A tire . All program or non-program scrap tires and processed tire material should be stored separately in order to maintain accurate inventories. The amount of the tip fee should be determined by what the program needs to accomplish and what you want it to pay for. This may cause the need for the fee structure in Louisiana to be revisited in the near future. The first consideration for additional tip fees is to add USED TIRE DEALERS to the program. We have polled most of our used tire dealers and they have all told us they would prefer to be added to the program the same as new tire dealers. Most have told us they are already collecting the $2 fee. This would cause them to be audited the same as new tire dealers and would eliminate the confusion they think may happen with the changes being considered now. The next possibleplace to add revenue to the fund would be a $10 fee on the sale of a new automobile for the five new tires that are added to the system each time a new automobile is sold.
But before we start talking about increasing the tip fee, I believe every effort should be made to get the program under control by appropriate oversight.
Those who would exploit the program for personal gain Will continue this misuse unless the appropriate checks and balances are implemented immediately. Only by contentious enforcement of the regulations can the program be protected from those with bad intentions. Once these persons are identified and removed from the program, Louisiana can continue to enjoy the most successful tire-recycling program in the country and more importantly the program can regain and maintain solvency.
Bill Vincent 337-235-0353
|