MEMPHIS TIRE CONFERENCE
December 5,6, 2002
SLIDE # 1
COLT
SLIDE # 2
A SOLUTION
SLIDE # 3
DISCLAIMER
· STATEMENTS MADE
IN THE FOLLOWING PRESENTATION, ABOUT SOME PARTICIPANTS IN THE SCRAP TIRE
INDUSTRY, ABSOLUTELY DO NOT APPLY TO ALL PARTICIPANTS.
· OBSERVATIONS MADE
ARE THOSE OF THE PRESENTER, AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE POSITION OF
ANY ORGANIZATION OR ASSOCIATION WITH WHICH THE PRESENTER IS AFFILIATED.
OPENING
To often we as processors
are perceived as adversaries in our dealings with regulatory agencies. Some of
the remarks I will make today may be taken in that light but I assure you they
are only made in the context of putting forth a CONCEPT that does address every
aspect of solving the scrap tire problem. A processor, the element in the
process that invests millions of dollars to become the most viable part of a
long term “TOTAL SOLUTION”, we seek only to become your partner, not an
adversary. A stable, level playing field is what we seek in order for us to
handle the problem NOW and to make the investments that will be required to
take it to the next level.
1.
THERE
IS NOT A TIRE RECYCLING PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY! THE PROBLEM IS FINDING THE MONEY TO PAY FOR IT.
2.
IN
EVERY STATE THE TIRE CONSUMER PAYS FOR TIRE RECYCLING EVERY TIME THEY LEAVE A
SCRAP TIRE WITH A TIRE DEALER. (ONE WAY OR THE OTHER)
3.
THE
TIRE CONSUMER COULD BE PAYING AS MUCH AS $5 TO HAVE THEIR TIRES RECYCLED.
4.
THE
PROBLEM IS THAT SOMETIMES THE AMOUNT THAT GETS TO THE PROCESSOR COULD BE AS
SMALL AS 50 CENTS OF THAT $5.
5.
SCRAP
TIRE PROCESSOR MUST BE PAID A REASONABLE UP FRONT TIP FEE.
6.
IN
SOME CASES IT COST MORE TO PRODUCE THE PRODUCT FROM A TIRE THAN THE MARKET IS
WILLING TO PAY FOR THE PRODUCT.
7.
THIS
GOES AGAINST THE GENERAL PERCEPTION THAT TIRE RECYCLERS ARE DOUBLE DIPPING
BECAUSE WE GET PAID UP FRONT AND ARE PAID AGAIN WHEN THE TIRE IS PROCESSED AND
DELIVERED TO MARKET.
TO OFTEN, THE TWO NUMBERS
ADDED TOGETHER (TIP FEE AND REVENUE FROM MARKETS) DO NOT
ADD UP TO ENOUGH TO COVER THE COST OF DEALING WITH A SCRAP TIRE.
SLIDE # 4
LOUISIANA PROGRAM
8.
ALTHOUGH
IT IS STILL “A WORK IN PROGRESS”, IT IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL TIRE RECYCLING
PROGRAM IN THE COUNTRY.
9.
IT
IS THE PROGRAM THAT SOLVES 100% OF THE PROBLEM.
10.IT IS A CONCEPT THAT HAS THE
ABILITY TO SATISFY EVERY ASPECT OF DEALING WITH THE SCRAP TIRE PROBLEM.
11.IT CONTROLS CURRENT
GENERATED SCRAP TIRES BETWEEN THE DEALER, THE PROCESSOR AND THE MARKETS.
SLIDE #5
LOUISIANA SUCCESS
In place for almost SEVEN YEARS
TIRES in STOCKPILES
A FEW
STRONG MARKETS
No TIRES illegally dumped
All elements are HAPPY
· TIRE CONSUMER
gets what they pay for.
SLIDE #6
A CONCEPT
This concept MAY NOT BE THE ONLY
SOLUTION to the problem—but it does represent the only CONCEPT I’ve seen that
has the ABILITY TO SATISFY EVERY ASPECT of the SCRAP TIRE PROBLEM---
this opinion is offered from experiences I’ve had from almost 20 years as a
SCRAP TIRE RECYCLER.
12.I AM NOT SUGGESTING WE
REINVENT THE WHEEL, RATHER THAT WE CONSIDER A CONCEPT THAT HAS BEEN IN PLACE
FOR MANY YEARS.
13.THIS IS A CONCEPT THAT HAS
BEEN SUCCESSFUL DEALING WITH A SIMILAR PROBLEM.
14.THE MONEY PAID FOR SERVICES
RENDERED, PAID BY CONSUMERS FOR THAT SERVICE, IS NOT A SUBSIDY.
SLIDE #7
NOT NEW
SLIDE #8
FEE BASED PROGRAMS
OPPONENTS SAY:
“WE DON’T WANT THE
GOVERNMENT INVOLVED IN OUR BUSINESS”.
IF YOU’RE IN THE SCRAP TIRE
BUSINESS, THE GOVERNMENT IS PROBABLY INVOLVED IN YOUR BUSINESS!
15.
I
THINK IT’S SAFE TO SAY THAT THE LOUISIANA DEQ. WITH A FEE BASED PROGRAM, IS NO
MORE INTRUSIVE IN OUR BUSINESS THAN ANY OTHER STATE AGENCY AROUND THE COUNTRY
THAT REGULATE SCRAP TIRES.
16.
THE
DIFFERENCE IS, IN LOUISIANA, THERE IS ENOUGH MONEY IN THE SYSTEM TO PAY EVERY
ONE IN THE PROGRAM WHO HANDLES LOUISIANA TIRES AND ALSO PAYS FOR ANY MANDATES
PLACED ON US BY THE AGENCY.
SLIDE #9
NOT A SUBSIDY
MONEY PAID BY THE
TIRE CONSUMER TO HAVE THEIR TIRES RECYCLED IS NOT A SUBSIDY.
17.
THE
SAME MONEY IS NOT CALLED A SUBSIDY WHEN WE COLLECT IT DIRECTLY FROM THE TIRE
DEALER.
THE MONEY IS PAID BY THE TIRE CONSUMER FOR TIRE RECYCLING; IT DOES NOT COME FROM OTHER RESOURCES IN THE GOVERNMENT.
18.
THE
IDEA THAT WHEN THE FEE GOES AWAY EVERYTHING THE “FEE” ACCOMPLISHED WILL GO AWAY.
19.
BELIEVE
THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A NEED FOR UP FRONT TIP FEES TO DEAL WITH A SCRAP TIRE AS
LONG AS AUTOMOBILE RIDES AROUND ON FOUR OF THEM.
20.
SAME
THING WITH WASTE, AS LONG AS WE HAVE WASTE, WE’LL HAVE TO PAY TO GET RID OF IT.
SLIDE #10
TEXAS
TEXAS HAD A FEE
BASED PROGRAM FROM 1992 TO 1997.
21.
TEXAS
HAS BEEN “HELD OUT” FOR YEARS AS ONE EXAMPLE OF WHY A FEE BASED PROGRAM WILL
NOT WORK.
22.
BECAUSE
I WAS A PROCESSOR EARLY IN THE PROGRAM AND ONE OF IT’S EARLY CASUALTIES, I
WOULD LIKE TO TRY AND DISPEL SOME OF THE MISTRUTHS THAT I’VE HEARD NOW FOR
YEARS.
IN MY OPINION IT IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF WHAT NOT TO DO TO MAKE A FEE BASED PROGRAM WORK.
23.
“PROCESSORS
STACKED UP THE RUBBER”.
24.
THE
REASON THE RUBBER WAS STACKED UP WAS BECAUSE TNRCC WOULD NOT APPROVE MARKETS.
25.
THIS
EFFECTIVELY PUT A LOT OF PROCESSOR OUT OF BUSINESS ONCE THEY FILLED UP THEIR
STORAGE FACILITY.
26.
ALL
THE MARKETS YOU FIND ON TNRCC WEB SITE THAT ARE NOW “APPROVED MARKETS” WERE IN FACT
MARKETS THAT WERE AVAILABLE IN 1992 BUT WE COULD NOT GET TNRCC’s APPROVAL IN
1992.
27.
ANOTHER
EXAMPLE WAS THE REQUIREMENT THAT 25% OF TIRES PROCESSED EACH MONTH HAD TO COME
FROM STOCK PILES ASSIGNED BY TNRCC.
28.
SOME
OF THOSE STOCK PILES WERE HUNDREDS OF MILES FROM THE PROCESSING FACILITY. THE
TIRES WERE IN CREEKS, RAVINES, RIVERS, IN SWAMPS, YOU GET THE IDEA, AND YOU
KNOW WHERE YOU FIND ILLEGAL TIRE DUMPS.
29.
IN
A LOT OF CASES THE .85 CENTS WE WERE PAID WOULD NOT PAY THE FREIGHT TO THE
PROCESSING FACILITY.
30.
THE
OTHER COST INVOLVED CAME OUT OF THE PROCESSORS POCKET.
31.
15
OF THE 17 ORIGINAL PROCESSORS DID NOT SURVIVE.
32.
THE
LOUISIANA PROGRAM DID NOT HAVE THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE THE AGENCY ISSUED RFP’S AS
THE FUND RECEIVED THE MONEY TO PAY FOR ABATEMENTS. THE CLEAN UP OF EACH
STOCKPILE WAS BID ON ITS OWN MERITS.
COMMON SENSE IS
THE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT NEEDED TO MAKE THIS CONCEPT WORK.
SLIDE # 11
CANADA
33.
CANADA
EVIDENTLY HAS PROGRAMS THAT ARE WORKING FOR THEM!
34.
THEIR
PROGRAM COLLECTS AS MUCH AS $4 FROM THE TIRE CONSUMER IN ORDER TO PAY FOR TIRE
RECYCLING.
THEIR PROGRAM
GIVES THEIR CRUMB RUBBER PRODUCERS THE ABILITY TO COMPETE IN U. S. MARKETS.
35.
WHY
DO WE IN THIS COUNTRY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A PROGRAM THAT PAYS THE PROCESSORS WHO
PARTICIPATE IN THAT PROGRAM ENOUGH MONEY SO THAT THEY ARE ABLE TO REACH MARKETS
THROUGHOUT THE U.S. AND WHO KNOWS WHERE ELSE.
THE LOUISIANA
CONCEPT WILL GIVE ITS CRUMB RUBBER PRODUCERS THE ABILITY TO COMPETE IN WORLD
MARKETS.
36.
INSTEAD
OF COMPLAINING ABOUT A PROGRAM THAT WORKS, WOULDN’T IT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR US
TO IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM THAT WILL, NOT ONLY SOLVE THE SCRAP TIRE PROBLEM IN OUR
COUNTRY BUT WOULD PAY OUR CRUMB RUBBER PRODUCERS ENOUGH SO THAT THEY CAN
COMPETE NOT ONLY IN THE U.S., BUT POSSIBLY GIVE THEM THE ABILITY TO COMPETE
AROUND THE WORLD.
SLIDE #12
USING THE MONEY
PAY ME NOW
OR
PAY ME MORE LATER
THE MOST COST
EFFECTIVE PLACE TO HANDLE A SCRAP TIRE IS WHEN IT IS REMOVED FROM A TIRE DEALER
RETAIL STORE, NOT AFTER ITS BEEN THROWN IN A DITCH.
SLIDE # 13
HOW MUCH TIP FEE
37.
THE
AMOUNT OF THE TIP FEE SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY WHAT YOU WANT THE PROGRAM TO
ACCOMPLISH.
38.
IT
NEEDS TO PAY FOR COLLECTING-PROCESSING-MARKETING
39.
I
UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WILL DEPEND ON YOUR ABILITY TO CONVINCE YOUR LEGISLATORS
TO COLLECT OR RAISE THE FEE, WHICH WILL NOT BE EASY.
40.
BUT
THE EVIDENCE IS THERE TO SHOW YOUR LEGISLATORS THAT THEIR CONSTITUENTS ARE
ALREADY PAYING, IN MOST CASES, MORE THAN YOUR AGENCY WILL REQUIRE TO SOLVE THE
PROBLEM.
41.
MAKING
SURE THE TIRE CONSUMER GETS WHAT THEY ARE PAYING FOR SHOULD BE THE MAIN CONCERN
OF THE LEGISLATOR.
42.
THE
MONEY COLLECTED FOR SCRAP TIRE RECYCLING SHOULD BE PLACED IN A DEDICATED FUND.
43.
THE
LOUISIANA PROGRAM DEALS WITH A LOT. IT PAYS TO COLLECT, PROCESS AND DELIVER TO
MARKETS, PASSENGER, TRUCK, ATV, OTR’S, INCLUDING ALMOST ALL FARM TRACTOR TIRES.
SLIDE #14
TIRE DEALER
44.
DEALER
COLLECTS MONEY FROM THE TIRE CONSUMER AND SENDS ALL OF IT TO THE STATE AGENCY.
45.
GIVES
TIRE DEALER FREE RECYCLING.
46.
THE
TIRE DEALER NO LONGER HAS TO NEGOTIATE A PRICE WITH A TRANSPORTER IN ORDER TO
HAVE THEIR TIRES REMOVED; THEY SIMPLY PICK THE PERSON TO REMOVE THEIR SCRAP
TIRES BASED ON THE BEST SERVICE.
47.
TIRE
DEALERS DO NOT MIND COLLECTING THE MONEY THAT WILL PAY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM,
BUT THEY DO WANT THE MONEY SPENT TO SOLVE THE TIRE PROBLEM, NOT FOR SOMETHING
ELSE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TIRES.
SLIDE #15
AGENCY
HOW SHOULD AN AGENCY BE JUDGED ON THE SUCCESS OF ITS PROGRAM?
IS IT BY HOW
MANY SCRAP TIRE PILES IT SUCCESSFULLY
CLEANS UP YEAR AFTER YEAR?
OR
IS IT BY HOW EFFECTIVE IT DEALS WITH CURRENT GENERATED SCRAP
TIRES SO THAT THERE ARE NO STOCK PILES TO CLEAN UP?
48.
I’VE
LEARNED IN THE LOUISIANA PROGRAM, IT IS NOT A PROGRAM THAT WILL OPERATE ON
AUTOMATIC PILOT.
49.
ONE
OF THE THINGS WE’VE LEARNED IS THAT THERE SHOULD BE A DEDICATED GROUP WITHIN
THE AGENCY THAT ADMINISTERS THIS PROGRAM. THE COST OF THAT GROUP IS PAID FROM
THE DEDICATED FUND.
50.
IF
THIS CONCEPT IS IMPLEMENTED PROPERLY IT SHOULD GIVE THE AGENCY MORE MONEY AND
TIME TO MANAGE THE SCRAP TIRE PROGRAM.
51.
DON’T
FORGET, THIS CONCEPT WILL ALWAYS BE A WORK IN PROGRESS AND WILL ALWAYS REQUIRE
PROPER MANAGEMENT.
52.
OUR
FRIENDS AT THE REGULATORY AGENCIES HAVE TO TALK TO WHO EVER SHOW UP. THEY GET
PULLED IN ALL DIRECTIONS AND IT’S EASY TO BE CONFUSED BY SPECIAL INTEREST
GROUPS AND/OR THOSE WHO HAVE THEIR OWN AGENDA.
53.
OUR
INDUSTRY LOOKS SIMPLE, BUT IN FACT IT IS VERY COMPLICATED.
SLIDE #16
PROCESSOR
54.
WITH
THE PROPER CHECKS AND BALANCES IN PLACE FOR THE PROCESSORS, IT GIVES THE AGENCY
AN EXCELLENT PLACE TO WATCH THE PROGRAM.
55.
IF
A TRANSPORTER OR PROCESSOR COMMITS FRAUD, A RED FLAG SHOULD SHOW UP FIRST AT
THE PROCESSOR BECAUSE EVERY THING THAT HAPPENS IN THE PROGRAM MOVES THRU THE
PROCESSOR.
56.
THE
LOUISIANA CONCEPT ALSO ADDRESSES THE PROBLEM WITH PROCESSORS WHO BUILD UP
STOCKPILES AND GO OUT OF BUSINESS.
57.
IN
MOST PROGRAMS THIS CAUSES THE NEED FOR SUBSTANTIAL BONDING AND/OR FINANCIAL
ASSURANCE SO THE AGENCY WILL HAVE THE MONEY TO CLEAN UP THE MESS.
58.
WITH
THE LOUISIANA CONCEPT THE MONEY PAID BY THE TIRE CONSUMER IS STILL IN THE BANK.
BECAUSE NO MONEY IS PAID OUT UNTIL TIRES HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO MARKET. LARGE
BONDS AND/OR FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ARE NOT REQUIRED.
IN LOUISIANA IT’S
EASIER TO WATCH FOUR [4] PROCESSORS THAN IT IS TO CHASE AROUND AFTER 110
TRANSPORTERS.
SLIDE #17
WHY THE PROCESSOR GETS THE
MONEY
LARGEST INVESTOR TOWARD A “TOTAL SOLUTION”.
ONLY ENTITY IN THE PROGRAM THAT CAN OFFER AN ON GOING “TOTAL SOLUTION” BECAUSE OF OUR ABILITY TO SERVE DIVERSE MARKETS.
SLIDE #18
TRANSPORTER
THIS ELEMENT HAS
TO BE CONTROLLED IF YOU’RE GOING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
59.
THIS
CONCEPT ELIMINATES WHAT WE REFER TO AS “THE BACK END PART OF THE PROBLEM”,
ILLEGAL DUMPS AND/OR STOCKPILES.
CAN THEY BE
CONTROLLED WITH ENFORCEMENT?
60.
I
DON’T THINK THEY CAN. A TRANSPORTER WHO WANTS TO DUMP ILLEGALLY WILL FIND A
WAY.
61.
CALIFORNIA
MIGHT BE A GOOD EXAMPLE OF WHY REGISTRATION/ENFORCEMENT WILL NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEMS
CAUSED BY THE TRANSPORTER WHO DOES NOT WANT TO BE LEGAL.
62.
A
RECENT ARTICLE IN SCRAP TIRE NEWS POINTED OUT THAT 10 OUT OF 23 TIRE HAULERS
STOPPED BY CHP WERE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA’S WASTE TIRE HAULER LAW
CREATED IN 1993 AND PLACED IN EFFECT IN 1995. THAT’S ONLY BEEN SEVEN [7] YEARS.
63.
ANY
ONE WHO HAS DEALT WITH A TIRE HAULER KNOWS THEY PROBABLY JUST NEED A LITTLE
MORE TIME TO GET LEGAL.
64.
IN
THE ALMOST 20 YEARS WE’VE BEEN IN THE BUSINESS, THIS CONCEPT IS THE ONLY WAY
WE’VE SEEN THAT CONTROLS THE TRANSPORTER AND CONTROLS 100% OF THE TIRES.
65.
TRANSPORTERS
DO HAVE TO BE CONTROLLED.
THEY CAN BE
CONTROLLED WITH MONEY!
PAY THEM ONLY
WHEN THEY DELIVER TIRES TO THE PROPER RECYCLING FACILITY.
SLIDE #19
JOCKEY
SLIDE #20
WHY JOCKEY IS A PROBLEM
PROCESSORS INVEST
MILLIONS of dollars in facilities and equipment to become the MOST VIABLE part
of a total solution to the SCRAP TIRE problem. In order to PAY BACK the
investment HE/SHE relies almost totally on a reasonable UP FRONT tip fee.
A TIRE JOCKEY CAN
BUY A 1977 PICK UP AND ESTABLISH WHAT THAT TIP FEE WILL BE IN THE MARKET PLACE.
66.
GIVING
MONEY AND THE TIRE TO SOMEONE IN 1977 PICK UP CAUSES MOST OF THE PROBLEMS THAT
HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED BY AN AGENCY DEALING WITH SCRAP TIRES.
67.
THIS
GUY REMOVES ALL POSSIBILITY OF STABILITY NEEDED TO MAKE A PROGRAM
SUCCESSFUL.
68.
IT
DOES NOT CREATE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD WHEN SOMEONE WHO INVEST MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS TO RECYCLE A TIRE HAS TO COMPETE WITH SOMEONE WHO INVEST A FEW THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND COULD CARE LESS WHERE THE TIRE ENDS UP, USUALLY SOME WHERE IN A
DITCH.
SLIDE #21
ENFORCEMENT
“TNRCC investigators discovered that tire transporters paid by
retail stores to properly dispose of used tires had instead dumped their
shipments on rented property. About 4,000 car and truck tires were found.”
(TNRCC Web Site,
Natural
Outlook, Fall 2001
“Taking Stock of Used Tires”)
SLIDE #22
MARKETS
MARKETS CAN NOT BE FORCED---THEY HAVE TO EVOLVE
69.
AS
I SAID SCRAP TIRE PROCESSOR MUST BE PAID AN UP FRONT TIP FEE.
70.
THE
REASON IS MOST MARKETS ARE NEGATIVE MARKETS. THE PRICE WE RECEIVE FOR TIRE
RUBBER COMPETES WITH OTHER PRODUCTS USED IN THE SAME APPLICATION.
71.
FOR
INSTANCE, WHEN TIRE RUBBER IS USED FOR FUEL IT COMPETES AGAINST THE PRICE OF
NATURAL GAS, COAL, HAZARDOUS WASTE, ETC.
72.
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING MARKETS OUR RUBBER COMPETES WITH SAND, GRAVEL, OTHER LIGHT
WEIGHT AGGREGATES.
WHO SHOULD SPEND
THE MONEY TO FIND OR CREATE MARKETS?
73.
PROCESSORS
KNOW WHAT PRODUCT THEIR EQUIPMENT WILL PRODUCE. PAY US THE MONEY AND LET US
IDENTIFY THE MARKETS WE CAN SERVE WITH THE PRODUCT WE PRODUCE.
WHAT MARKETS
SHOULD BE APPROVED?
74.
THE
SUPPORT WE NEED FROM THE REGULATORY AGENCY IS PROMPT APPROVAL OF THE MARKETS
THAT WE FIND.
75.
THIS
WOULD REQUIRE A COMMON SENSE APPROACH FOR THE TIMELY APPROVAL OF MARKETS BY THE
REGULATORY AGENCY IN EACH STATE.
ARE THERE MARKETS
THAT WILL PAY FOR TIRE RECYCLING WITHOUT A TIP FEE?
76.
ITS
NICE TO COME TOGETHER AT THESE MEETINGS AND TALK ABOUT FUTURE MARKETS THAT WILL
POSSIBLY PAY FOR TIRE RECYCLING WITHOUT A TIP FEE.
77.
BUT
I BELIEVE THE JURY IS STILL OUT AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A MARKET
SOMEWHERE IN THE FUTURE THAT WILL PAY FOR TIRE RECYCLING.
78.
ONE
THING I DO KNOW FOR SURE IS THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF TIRES THAT WILL HAVE BE
DEALT WITH WHILE THOSE MARKETS DEVELOP, IF THEY DO DEVELOP.
79.
AS
A PROCESSOR WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THOSE TIRES NOW, IN LARGE QUANTITIES EVERY
DAY. THAT SERVICE REQUIRES AN UP FRONT TIP FEE.
80.
AS
REGULATORS WE HOPE YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THAT AS SOON AS OTHER MARKETS ARE
AVAILABLE AND WE HAVE THE CHOICE OF SELLING OUR PRODUCT FOR $180 A TON AS
OPPOSED TO $25 A TON. WE WILL BE SENDING OUR RUBBER TO THE $180 TON MARKET.
81.
I
THINK APPROVING A MARKET SHOULD BE AS SIMPLE AS, “IF IT IS ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE
AND SOMEONE WANTS TO USE IT, APPROVE IT AS A MARKET.
SLIDE #23
DIVERSITY OF MARKETS
A PROCESSOR SHOULD
HAVE AT LEAST (5) FIVE MARKETS TO INSURE IT’S ABILITY TO DELIVER PRODUCT WITHOUT
INTERRUPTION.
82.
THIS
CONCEPT MIGHT NOT HAVE WORKED THREE YEARS AGO BECAUSE OF AVAILABILITY OF
MARKETS.
83.
MARKETS
HAVE IMPROVED, THANKS TO DANA; TO THE POINT WHERE I BELIEVE THE REQUIREMENT TO DELIVER
PRODUCT TO MARKET BEFORE THE PROCESSOR IS PAID COULD WORK IN ANY STATE.
THE PROCESSOR
NEEDS TO DETERMINE THE MARKET IT WANTS TO PURSUE.
A FEW EXAMPLES OF
MARKETS THAT SHOULD BE STANDARD IN EVERY STATE ARE: TIRE DERIVED FUEL--- SEPTIC
SYSTEMS---EMBANKMENT FILL--- ALT.DAILY COVER AT LANDFILLS--- MULCH--- CRUMB
RUBBER PRODUCTS--- LAND RECLAMATION--- LAND FILL CONSTRUCTION---AND MORE
THE PROCESSOR IS THE MOST
VIABLE PART OF A PROGRAM THAT OFFERS “A TOTAL SOLUTION” BECAUSE OF THEIR
ABILITY TO SERVE DIVERSE MARKETS.
SLIDE #24
ENCOURAGE MARKETS
NOT PART OF LOUISIANA PROGRAM
$50 / ton to any
facility which reduces TIRE RUBBER into CRUMB RUBBER or any other PROCESS that
separates TIRE components sold into markets.
SLIDE #25
WHY THE CONCEPT WORKS
Everyone gets
PAID for what they contribute
TIRE DEALER gets
FREE TIRE recycling.
AGENCY PAID to
administer program.
Transporter PAID
to deliver tires to
TIRE RECYCLER.
&